rJournal of Vocational Behavior 69 (2006) 19–29 www.elsevier.com/locate/jvb
The evolution from the boundaryless profession concept: Analyzing physical and psychological flexibility Sherry E. Sullivan a, ¤, Jordan B. Arthur b, you
Department of Management, School of Business, Bowling Green State University or college, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA w Sawyer Institution of Administration, SuVolk University or college, 8 Ashurton Place, Boston, MA 02108, USA Received 8 September 2005 Available 16 November 2005 a
Abstract Although there has been elevated interest in the boundaryless career since the syndication of Arthur and Rousseau's book (1996), there is even now some disbelief about what the notion means. This information examines the boundaryless career and shows a model that attempts to visually capture Arthur and Rousseau's advice that the idea involves 6 underlying symbolism. Rather than looking at whether or not a person has a boundaryless career, the model is targeted on the degree of flexibility reXected in a career along two empieza: one psychological, one physical. Based on the model, we suggest Wve propositions and a series of directions for future research. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Most rights arranged. Keywords: Career; Boundaryless; Protean; Women; Changes; Mobility; Gender
1 . Introduction There have been requires greater clarity of terms and further theory of the boundaryless career (e. g., Inkson, 2002; Pringle & Mallon, 2003; Sullivan, 1999) and its distinction from the concept of the protean profession (Briscoe, Corridor, & DeMuth, 2006; Hall, 1996; Area, Briscoe, & Kram, 1997). Some authors have considered the boundaryless job Thanks to Jon Briscoe, Madeline Crocitto, Tim Hall, Kerr Inkson, Sally Power, and two anonymous reviewers for his or her insightful remarks on earlier drafts in the manuscript. * Corresponding writer. Fax: plus1 419 372 6057. E-mail addresses: [email protected] bgsu. edu (S. E. Sullivan), [email protected] edu (M. B. Arthur). 1 Send: +1 617 994 4260. 0001-8791/$ - see front side matter © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi: 10. 1016/j. jvb. 2005. 09. 001
S. E. Sullivan, M. B. Arthur / Diary of Professional Behavior 69 (2006) 19–29
as concerning only physical changes in function arrangements. In contrast, other experts have considered the protean career concept as involving just psychological adjustments. However , this kind of separation among physical (or objective) job changes and psychological (or subjective) career changes neglects the interdependence between the physical and psychological career planets. The result is a body of work that lacks applicability to get the individual, who also needs to take both physical and psychological issues into account. Similarly, that lacks use for the practicing administrator or profession counselor who seeks to compliment the individual. Although recent research has begun to recognize the links among physical and psychological job changes (e. g., Marler, Barringer, & Milkovich, 2002; Peiperl, Arthur, GoVee, & Morris, 2k; Valcour & Tolbert, 2003), there even now remain rich opportunities for additional research. In this article, we seek to stimulate fresh research by simply focusing on two questions. Initially, how can we further simplify and elaborate on the meaning with the boundaryless career? Second, how could we better explore the possible discussion of mobility across (a) physical and (b) emotional boundaries? All of us begin by analyzing Arthur and Rousseau's (1996) deWnition with the boundaryless profession as well as it is subsequent presentation and software. Next, we present an auto dvd unit to better demonstrate the physical and psychological aspects of boundaryless careers. Making use of this model like a basis, we explore how career competencies, gender, lifestyle, and specific diVerences inXuence individuals' opportunities for physical and emotional mobility. Finally, we discuss the ramifications of these delete word both practice and foreseeable future research. installment payments on your Mobility throughout physical and psychological limitations Arthur and...
References: Arthur, M. W., Khapova, S. N., & Wilderom, C. P. Meters. (2005). Job success within a boundaryless career world. Record of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 177–202. Arthur, M. W., & Rousseau, D. Meters. (Eds. ). (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for any new company era. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Briscoe, J. G., Hall, Deb. T., & DeMuth, L. L. N. (2006) Protean and boundaryless careers: A great empirical pursuit. Journal of Vocational Habit, 69, 30–47. DeFillippi, L. J., & Arthur, Meters. B. (1996). Boundaryless situations and jobs: A competency-based perspective. In M. W. Arthur & D. Meters. Rousseau (Eds. ), The boundaryless profession. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eby, M. T., Butts, M., & Lockwood, A. (2003). Predictors of achievement in the time of the boundaryless career. Diary of Organizational Behavior, twenty four, 689–708. Eby, L. Big t., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Operate and family members research in IO/OB: Articles analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 124–197. Gunz, L., Evans, Meters., & Jalland, M. (2000). Career boundaries in a boundaryless world. In M. Peiperl, M. N. Arthur, L. GoVe, & T. Morris (Eds. ), Career frontiers: New conceptualizations of functioning lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Area, D. T. (1996). The career is dead-long live position. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Area, D. To., Briscoe, T. P., & Kram, T. E. (1997). Identity, beliefs and learning in the protean career. In C. T. Cooper & S. Electronic. Jackson (Eds. ), Creating tomorrow's organizations (pp. 321–335). London: John Wiley & Sons. Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures effects: International diVerences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, FLORIDA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural diVerences in management and planning. Asia PaciWc Log of Management, 1, 81–99. Inkson, T. (2002). Pondering creatively regarding careers: The application of metaphor. In M. Peiperl, M. B. Arthur, 3rd there�s r. GoVee, & N. Anand (Eds. ). Career creativeness: Explorations inside the re-making of work. (pp. 25–34). Inkson, T. (this issue). Protean and boundaryless jobs as metaphors. Journal of Vocational Behavior. Kidd, J. M., Hirsh, W., & Jackson, C. (2004). Straight talking: The nature of eVective job discussion at work. Journal of Career Development, 3(4), 231–245. Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, T. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, Elizabeth. (2000). Sexual diVerences and similarities in job feature preferences: A meta-analysis. Mental Bulletin, 126, 593–641. Mainiero, L. Meters. (1994a). Getting anointed to advance: The case of executive ladies. Academy of Management Exec, 8(2), 53–67.
S. Electronic. Sullivan, Meters. B. Arthur / Journal of Vocational Behavior 69 (2006) 19–29
Mainiero, L. A. (1994b). Breaking the glass limit: The politics seasoning of powerful females executives. Company Dynamics, 5–20. Mainiero, T. A., & Sullivan, T. E. (2005). Kaleidoscope professions: An alternative justification for the opt-out wave. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 106–123. Mainiero, D. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2006). The Opt-Out Revolt: How come People are Giving Companies to Create Kaleidoscope Careers. Palo Enorme, CA: Davies-Black Publishing. Marler, J. H., Barringer, M. W., & Milkovich, G. T. (2002). Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: Planets apart. Log of Organizational Behavior, twenty three, 425–453. Nelson, D. D. (2000). Girls executives: Well being, stress, and success. Senior high of Managing Executive, 14(2), 107–112. Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, T. H. (1997). Integrating operate and friends and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world. Westport, COMPUTERTOMOGRAFIE: Quorum Books. Peiperl, Meters., Arthur, Meters., GoVee, Ur., & Morris, T. (2000). Career frontiers: New concepts of operating lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Powell, G. And. (Ed. ). (1993). Males and females in management. Birmingham: Sage. Powell, G. N. (Ed. ). (1999). Guide of sexuality and operate. London: Sage. Powell, G. N., & Mainiero, T. A. (1992). Cross-currents in the river of your energy: Conceptualizing the complexities of women's careers. Journal of Management, 18215–18237. Pringle, T. K., & Mallon, Meters. (2003). Challenges for the boundaryless career odyssey. Foreign Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(5), 839–853. Ramamoorthy, N., & Carroll, S. (1998). Individualism/collectivism orientations and reactions toward alternative human resource management practices. Human Relations, 51(5), 571–588. Erscheinungsbild, E. They would. (1978). Career dynamics. Studying, MA: Addison-Wesley. Sullivan, H. E. (1999). The changing nature of careers: An assessment and study agenda. Journal of Administration, 25, 457–484. Sullivan, H. E. & Mainiero, L. (2000). Can certainly careers: Guidelines and techniques for a new age. Annual Appointment of the Senior high of Management, Toronto, Canada. Sullivan, H. E., Martin, D. Farrenheit., Carden, T. A., & Mainiero, L. A. (2004). The road less traveled: How you can manage the recycling profession stage. Record of Management and Organization Studies, 10(2), 34–42. Valcour, P. M., & Tolbert, P. T. (2003). Male or female, family, and career in the era of boundarylessness: Determinants and eVects of intra- and interorganizational mobility. Foreign Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(5), 768–787.