Modernization and Dependency Theory Essay

Modernization and Dependency theory

Currently the quick development of the term and the developing integration of countries can scarcely fail to impact the development of fresh theories which usually attempt to clarify the relationship between countries and the existing inequality between designed countries and countries with the third world. To that end, it is possible to relate to Modernization theory and Dependency theory which, becoming quite different, still have certain commonalities in their views on the modern world and relationships between developed and developing countries. It is worthy of mention that the comparison of these theories can help better understand the current styles in intercontinental relations plus the future points of views of the world. At the same time, this theories help assess the current circumstance and human relationships between developed and undeveloped countries even more objectively as a result of existing dissimilarities between the two theories.

First of all, it must be said that Dependency theory was created in response to Modernization theory out of sheer criticism of the other theory by the supporters of Dependency theory. Naturally, this fact decided the principal difference between these theories, but , nevertheless, you will still find certain similarities between Modernization and Dependency theories. Talking about the commonalities, it is primarily necessary to speak about that equally theories pay out a lot of attention to the gap existing between created countries and undeveloped kinds belonging to the under developed. To put it more accurately, Modernization and Dependency theory stand on the floor that Traditional western countries would be the world leaders due to their higher level of development, which usually affects almost all spheres of your life, including financial, political, sociable, and even ethnic life (Leys, 210). Therefore, there are present a strong link between produced and growing countries. Furthermore both theories state that the expertise of developed countries is and then developing and undeveloped countries, which basically develop in the same way as produced countries however they cannot catch the latter up and stay in the rearguard of the world advancement. In stark contrast, produced countries play the key role in the advancement the entire world plus the integration coming from all countries worldwide in the global economy is among the major ways of interaction between developed and developing countries and both theories confirms that this discussion constantly boosts. At the same time, both Modernization and Dependency hypotheses underline which the relationships between developed and developing countries is unequal and generally there exist a kind of dependence of developing countries on developed ones, though the views on this dependence vary considerably. Even so, both ideas underline the dominant situation of American countries now and keep little space for the choice ways of the development but the american one, which can be viewed as the only method of the progress the future universe in the context of the global economy. It is worthy of which both ideas are ethnocentric in a way mainly because they practically ignore the chance of the alternative development of developing countries but , instead they insist that the progress western countries will be the example developing countries, willingly or perhaps not, follows, while, as well, they do not genuinely admit the choice ways of progress countries with the Third world (Preston, 137). However , it is worth mention the example of China and tiawan which economy is moving on rapidly but its way of creation differs noticeably from the prominent western approach, but america does not meet up with to the fundamental assumptions of either in the theories. Despite existing commonalities between Modernization theory and Dependency theory, differences together...

Developing Countries’ Financial Markets. Some of the Parameters. Essay